Skip to content
JSHS Intelligence Brief

Counselor intelligence brief

Junior Science and Humanities Symposium

A working database for advising JSHS candidates: what it is, who it fits, how students advance, what awards are at stake, which region owns the process, and what needs verification before anyone spends months polishing a paper.

Snapshot date: 2026-05-16. Built from the ICS listing, public JSHS pages, regional host pages, search-indexed core-rule excerpts, and M5 Pro synthesis.

1. Current Status

Returned, site still updating

The official JSHS homepage now says JSHS has officially returned and that the website is being updated. Some legacy URLs and file links still redirect to a suspended/returning announcement, so counselor-facing data should preserve last-verified dates and source confidence.

What still appears stable

  • Program: free, individual STEM research competition for grades 9-12.
  • Sponsor: Department of Defense through Army, Navy, and Air Force support.
  • Administration: National Science Teaching Association.
  • Path: written research submission, regional symposium, national symposium.

Competition type

Research

Submission plus oral or poster presentation.

Student level

9-12

High school students in the U.S., territories, and DoDEA schools.

Cost

Free

National Symposium is described as all-expenses paid for invited finalists.

2. Regional Deadline Intelligence

This is now a source-aware deadline layer, not just a routing table. Current 2026 rows are separated from archival rows so counselors can distinguish usable dates from timing clues.

Current 2026 rows

5

Regions with current or replacement-event data.

Archival rows

4

Useful for cadence, not direct planning.

Confidence model

3 levels

High, medium, and stale/verify before use.

Region Cycle Student deadline Event date Format notes Confidence
Great Plains
Oklahoma State University Honors College
2026
current regional page
2026-01-30 2026-02-20 Oral presentations only; no poster session at the regional competition. high
DoDEA Europe
DoDEA Europe JSHS
2026
current regional page
2026-01-08 2026-02-25 to 2026-02-27 Project submission requires paper, abstract, and Statement of Outside Assistance. high
Connecticut
CT AHEC / UConn Health
2026
replacement event
2025-12-15 2026-02-28 Connecticut High School Science and Humanities Symposium, nearly identical to prior CT JSHS process. high
New York Upstate
Rochester Institute of Technology
2026
mixed-year page
2025-12-04 2025 page references February 1 regional event; verify 2026 event date Abstract registration deadline; page describes 48 oral and 24 poster competitors for in-person regional event. medium
Tennessee
Listed through JSHS regional page
2026
TBD
TBD TBD Regional page says 2026 information and dates will be posted in fall 2025. medium
Arkansas
Arkansas Tech University
2025
archival regional page
2025-01-22 oral; 2025-02-07 poster/post-deadline oral 2025-02-21 to 2025-02-22 Oral and poster routes; post-deadline oral presenters remain eligible for poster prizes. medium
Wyoming and Colorado
University of Wyoming
2025
archival regional page
2025-02-08 2025-03-01 Virtual regional symposium; abstract and research paper emailed as a single PDF plus online registration. medium
Northern California
San Francisco State University
2025
archival regional page
Application/submission opening listed as 2024-11-16; verify exact deadline Acceptance decisions listed as 2025-02-02 Regional host page with application timeline and category details. medium
Southern California
California State University Long Beach
2025
archival regional page
Proposal deadline listed but source snippet truncates exact date; verify on live page Verify on live page 250-word abstract with 1-inch margins, single spaced, 12-point Times New Roman, header fields for title, author, school, and mentor/sponsor. medium

3. Fit and Eligibility

The advising question is not just "is the student smart?" It is whether the student has an original, defensible STEM research story and a region with an active pathway.

Quick fit check

Four filters. No data leaves the browser.

Best-fit student

  • Already has a completed or near-complete STEM research investigation.
  • Can explain methods, limitations, and why the result matters.
  • Can turn a written paper into a clear 12-minute research talk.
  • Has mentor, teacher, or lab context available for documentation.

Weak-fit student

  • Only has a science fair display, not a paper-ready research argument.
  • Needs a credential on a tight senior-year deadline.
  • Cannot verify region deadlines or active 2026 participation.
  • Has a team project but no single presenter ready to own the work.

4. Rules Matrix

A counselor-facing extraction of the core rules that determine eligibility, compliance risk, and whether the project should be routed to JSHS at all.

Rule field Rule Counselor check Confidence
Grade eligibility Students in grades 9-12 may participate through their regional symposium. Confirm grade level and whether the student is enrolled in public, private, home, online, DoDEA, or territory school context. high
Region assignment Students may compete in only one regional symposium. School address determines the region, except the Virtual Region; online high school students compete where they reside. Resolve region before working on deadlines because region pages control submission mechanics. high
Citizenship Student must be a U.S. citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident. Indexed 2025-2026 rules also include Legal Permanent Residents of American Samoa. Ask early and verify edge cases with the Regional Director. high
Research window Research must have been conducted within the calendar year before the regional event. For continuation projects, identify which work is genuinely new inside the eligible window. high
Continuation projects Prior work may continue only with significant new research, expanded methodology or variables, and explicit discussion of revisions to experimentation, analysis, methodology, and data. Require a one-paragraph continuation statement before drafting. high
Allowed project origins Class projects, science fair projects, and summer research projects may be submitted if they report original research. The venue is flexible on origin but strict on student ownership and original investigation. high
Ineligible project types Demonstrations, library research, literature reviews, and informational projects are not appropriate. Convert demo-builds into hypothesis-driven tests or route elsewhere. high
Required materials Regional applications usually require a written report, abstract or abstract plus paper, Statement of Outside Assistance, and Ideal-Logic completion by the regional deadline. Build a region-specific document checklist, because regions vary in abstract-only versus abstract-plus-paper review. high
Outside assistance Assistance from teachers, mentors, parents, or other students may be obtained, but the student must clearly communicate their own role and understand the results. Audit mentor-heavy lab projects for student contribution before submission. high
Same-project advancement If the student advances to National JSHS, the same project from the regional event must be presented. Do not plan a national pivot; polish the regional project instead. high

5. Competition Path

JSHS is regional first. The national opportunity is earned through the local region, and the first routing task is finding the correct regional host.

  1. Stage 1

    Find the student's region

    Students begin by identifying the competing region assigned to their school or location. Region pages control deadlines, application details, and local symposium format.

  2. Stage 2

    Submit original research

    The student submits an original, independent research paper. Cached 2025-2026 rules indicate abstract, paper, outside assistance, research-integrity, and human/animal-subject rules matter.

  3. Stage 3

    Compete at the Regional Symposium

    Top submissions are invited to present at their Regional Symposium. Regional events use national score sheets for oral and poster judging.

  4. Stage 4

    Advance to National JSHS

    The top five participants at each region advance. The top two present orally at nationals, while third through fifth present posters.

6. Awards and Advancement Model

The award structure is easy to misstate. Keep regional scholarships separate from national oral scholarships and national poster cash awards.

Regional

Regional oral winners

  • 1st place: $2,000 scholarship
  • 2nd place: $1,500 scholarship
  • 3rd place: $1,000 scholarship

Top five regional participants advance to National JSHS; top two are national oral presenters and third through fifth are national poster presenters.

National oral

Top two regional delegates compete as oral presenters

  • 1st place: $12,000 scholarship
  • 2nd place: $8,000 scholarship
  • 3rd place: $4,000 scholarship

Highest-prestige JSHS outcome; requires both research rigor and polished live defense.

National poster

Regional places three through five compete as poster presenters

  • 1st place: $550 cash award
  • 2nd place: $450 cash award
  • 3rd place: $350 cash award

Still a national-level research presentation credential, usually less selective than oral placement.

ICS describes more than $400,000 in scholarships and cash awards across regional and national levels.

7. Research Category Intelligence

Use these as advising buckets, then verify the current sub-discipline list with live JSHS rules or the Regional Director.

Biomedical Sciences / Medicine and HealthComputer Science and MathematicsEngineering and TechnologyEnvironmental ScienceLife SciencesPhysical Sciences / Chemistry

Biomedical Sciences / Medicine and Health

Strong signals

  • Mechanism-linked hypothesis
  • Clear controls and measurable outcomes
  • IRB or ethics readiness for human-subject data
  • Ability to explain clinical relevance without overstating impact

Likely judge questions

  • Why this endpoint?
  • What confounders remain?
  • How was bias controlled?

Risk flags

  • Retrospective data with no clear student-owned analysis
  • Medical claims beyond the evidence
  • Human-subject ambiguity

Computer Science and Mathematics

Strong signals

  • Algorithm is evaluated against a meaningful research question
  • Baseline comparisons
  • Error analysis
  • Transparent dataset construction

Likely judge questions

  • What is the baseline?
  • How does performance change out-of-sample?
  • What failure modes did you inspect?

Risk flags

  • Demo app with no experiment
  • Black-box model use without understanding
  • Accuracy-only evaluation

Engineering and Technology

Strong signals

  • Problem constraints are explicit
  • Prototype tested under repeatable conditions
  • Design tradeoffs are quantified
  • Failure modes are documented

Likely judge questions

  • What design alternatives did you reject?
  • How did you test reliability?
  • What metric defines success?

Risk flags

  • Invention-as-showcase without controlled testing
  • No comparison against existing approach
  • Aesthetic prototype without data

Environmental Science

Strong signals

  • Field or sensor data with defensible sampling
  • Spatial/temporal limitations acknowledged
  • Policy or ecosystem relevance grounded in results
  • Good handling of noisy measurements

Likely judge questions

  • How representative is your sample?
  • What seasonal effects matter?
  • How did you calibrate instruments?

Risk flags

  • One-time sampling overgeneralized
  • Map or dashboard without hypothesis
  • Correlation presented as causation

Life Sciences

Strong signals

  • Biological mechanism is stated
  • Replicates and controls are visible
  • Methods are reproducible
  • Statistics fit the experiment

Likely judge questions

  • Why this organism/model?
  • What is the control condition?
  • How many replicates?

Risk flags

  • Small n without caveat
  • Protocol copied without rationale
  • Result described but not interpreted

Physical Sciences / Chemistry

Strong signals

  • Quantitative measurement
  • Uncertainty and calibration discussed
  • Clear theory-to-experiment connection
  • Appropriate safety and materials handling

Likely judge questions

  • What is your measurement uncertainty?
  • How did you calibrate?
  • What does theory predict?

Risk flags

  • Unsafe materials without oversight
  • No uncertainty estimate
  • Pretty reaction or device with shallow analysis

8. Regional Host Database

Search by region, host institution, or assignment hint. This is a routing table, not a deadline table. Region deadlines should be verified from the active regional page or director.

49 regional entries

Region Host institution Assignment hint
Alabama Alabama Junior Academy of Science AL
Alaska University of Alaska Fairbanks AK
Arizona The University of Southern Mississippi AZ
Arkansas Arkansas Tech University AR
California Northern San Francisco State University Northern CA
California Southern California State University Long Beach Southern CA
Chicago Loyola University Chicago Chicago area
Connecticut University of Connecticut Health Center CT
DoDEA Europe Department of Defense Education Activity - Europe DoDEA Europe
DoDEA Pacific Department of Defense Education Activity - Pacific DoDEA Pacific
Florida University of Florida Center for Precollegiate Education and Training FL
Georgia University of Georgia Center for Continuing Education and Hotel GA
Great Plains Oklahoma State University Honors College Great Plains
Greater Washington, D.C. The Catholic University of America DC area
Hawaii and Pacific Hawai'i Academy of Science HI and Pacific
Heartland University of Iowa Heartland
Illinois Southern Illinois University Carbondale Illinois outside Chicago
Indiana The University of Indianapolis IN
Intermountain Utah State University Intermountain
Kentucky University of Louisville Research Foundation KY
Louisiana Louisiana Tech LA
Maryland The Patuxent Partnership MD
Michigan Wayne State University MI
Mississippi The University of Southern Mississippi MS
Missouri University of Missouri MO
New England Northern University of Maine Northern New England
New England Southern Roger Williams University Southern New England
New Jersey Northern Rutgers University Northern NJ
New Jersey Southern Ocean County College Southern NJ
New York-Long Island York College/CUNY Long Island
New York-Metro York College/CUNY NY Metro
New York-Upstate Rochester Institute of Technology Upstate NY
North Carolina University of North Carolina Charlotte NC
North Central Augustana University North Central
Ohio Capital University OH
Oregon The University of Southern Mississippi OR
Pennsylvania Juniata College PA
Philadelphia and Delaware Temple University Philadelphia and DE
Puerto Rico The Intellexi Foundation PR
South Carolina University of South Carolina SC
Southwest The University of Southern Mississippi Southwest
Tennessee University of Tennessee Knoxville TN
Texas Texas A&M University TX
Virginia Longwood University VA
Virtual The University of Southern Mississippi Virtual
Washington The University of Southern Mississippi WA
West Virginia West Virginia Wesleyan College WV
Wisconsin/Upper Peninsula Michigan Carthage College WI and Upper Peninsula MI
Wyoming and Colorado University of Wyoming WY and CO

10. Student Readiness Rubric

A scoring backbone for deciding whether a student is not ready, regionally viable, or plausibly national-contender material.

Criterion Regional-ready National-ready Red flag
Original research question Question is testable and has completed data. Question has significance beyond a class exercise and can survive technical probing. Demonstration, literature review, or informational project.
Methods rigor Methods are described clearly enough for a judge to follow. Controls, variables, sampling, and limitations are defensible. Student cannot explain why a method was chosen.
Analysis quality Results are visualized and interpreted. Statistical or computational analysis matches the research design and includes error/uncertainty thinking. Only screenshots, raw tables, or accuracy claims.
Student ownership Student can state their contribution and outside assistance. Student can answer detailed questions without leaning on mentor authority. Mentor/lab did the technical core.
Compliance readiness SOA and any human/animal/safety approvals are identified. All compliance questions are documented before submission. Human-subject data, vertebrate animals, or hazardous materials with unclear approval.
Presentation readiness Student can deliver a clear timed talk or poster walkthrough. Student can handle adversarial Q&A on assumptions, controls, and next steps. Memorized script with fragile understanding.

11. Counselor Playbook

First intake questions

  1. What region owns the student's school or residence?
  2. Is the region accepting submissions this cycle?
  3. What is the exact deadline and required paper format?
  4. Was the project individual or team-based?
  5. What approvals, if any, were needed before data collection?

Prep sequence

  1. Confirm live regional status.
  2. Audit paper against core rules and region-specific instructions.
  3. Build a concise talk from the research question outward.
  4. Run technical Q&A drills on methods, statistics, limitations, and student contribution.
  5. Prepare poster version in case the student advances as a national poster presenter.

Highest-leverage warning

Treat region pages and directors as the operative source for deadlines until the national site is fully rebuilt.

12. Source Confidence Layer

Every major fact class now carries a confidence note so stale regional pages do not get treated like current rules.

Official national JSHS homepage

Confidence: high for current program status, low for detailed rules while pages are being rebuilt

Use for returned/suspended status and official contact posture.

Last checked: 2026-05-16

Indexed 2025-2026 core rules excerpts

Confidence: high for rule language surfaced in search snippets, medium because direct PDF URL currently redirects

Use for core eligibility and submission mechanics, with verification caveat.

Last checked: 2026-05-16

Regional host pages

Confidence: high when page is current for 2026, medium when mixed-year or archival

Use for deadlines and format details after checking cycle year.

Last checked: 2026-05-16

ICS listing

Confidence: medium

Use for stable public overview, awards, sponsor, and eligibility summary. Verify against official/regional pages for current deadlines.

Last checked: 2026-05-16

Press releases and regional winner pages

Confidence: medium to high depending on publisher

Use for historical pattern analysis, not current rules.

Last checked: 2026-05-16